The rules of this site
Three states of a cell, and the rule that keeps them apart
Every figure on this site was copied out of a document and carries the clause number it came from. Everything absent is recorded as one of two different kinds of absence, and neither of them is ever printed as a zero or as a permission.
What counts as a source
Four kinds of document, in descending order of weight.
The terms and conditions. The contract accepted at registration. Where anything on this site conflicts with anything else, this is what governs.
A policy. Responsible gambling, anti-money-laundering, know-your-customer. Written for regulators and auditors, which often makes it more candid than the terms. Wild.io's wording on identity documents comes from its responsible gambling policy, and CoinPoker's does too. Shuffle's anti-money-laundering policy is the only document in the set that admits a threshold exists without saying what it is.
A help page or FAQ. A description of practice rather than a term. KatsuBet's wording was read from one. Where a help page and the terms disagree, both are reported and the terms are identified as the binding one — as they are for Rakebit on where the claim is printed.
A licence register. Not written by the operator, which is what makes it useful. A link that resolves to an individual certificate is worth more than one that resolves to a register index, and a link pointing back at the operator's own site is worth nothing at all. All three appear in this set, and they are separated on the licence behind it.
The three states of a cell
Every cell in the comparison table is in exactly one of three states, and the difference between the last two is the point of the whole design.
A figure with a clause. Copied from a document. Two exist for withdrawal ceilings in this set and none for verification thresholds.
Not published. The document is on file, it was read, and it holds nothing on that point. This is a claim about the operator's disclosure and it can only be made after reading. Rakebit's ceiling cell is in this state: its terms of use were read and no ceiling was found in them.
Not read. No document is on file here covering that point. This is a claim about this site and not about the operator. Flush's verification cell is in this state, because no verification wording for Flush is held here at all.
A cell never moves from the third state to the second because time has passed or because the gap looks small. Presenting an absence of reading as an act of reading is the single failure this design exists to prevent.
The empty-field rule
An empty field is never a zero, never a no, and never a permission.
An operator with no published verification threshold has not promised never to ask for documents; the discretionary clauses on the check that stops it say the opposite. An operator with no published ceiling has not committed to paying any amount at once. An operator with no readable restricted-country list has not said it accepts everybody.
Where an operator publishes no coin list, no games count and no processing period, those columns are simply not shown rather than filled with repeated admissions. A column that no row can fill says nothing, and a table full of identical blanks hides the columns that do differ.
What the marker on the twelve means
The instant-withdrawal marker used throughout this site records that the operator presents its withdrawals that way on its own pages. It was applied by reading the operator, not by timing it.
It is therefore evidence about advertising and nothing else. This site treats it as the subject rather than as a recommendation: the twelve are here because they make the claim, and each page asks what stands behind it. The population and the individual records are on who advertises it.
What this site cannot establish
Reading has a hard edge and it is worth naming it precisely.
It cannot say how long a withdrawal takes. It cannot say whether a payout arrives at all. It cannot say whether support answers, whether an account is closed fairly, or whether a discretionary clause is used reasonably in practice. All of those would need an account, a deposit and a dispute, and this site has never had any of the three.
It also cannot see private policy. Shuffle's undisclosed threshold is proof that operational rules exist beyond what is published, and there is no reason to think Shuffle is unusual in having one — only in admitting it.
What reading can establish is what was written down, by whom, on which surface and in which clause. That is the whole product here, and what a fuller disclosure would look like is drafted on what would count as proof. Who writes it and how it is funded is on about this site.