Terms accepted at sign-up
Anjouan, ALSI-202606048-FI2 cl. 1.1
Authority’s register
Curaçao, Metaspins N.V., OGL/2024/1063/0437, active
Two authorities, two numbers; the files do not reconcile them.
When the records name different bodies
Two Licence Numbers Behind One Casino Brand, and Which Page Prints Each
Some ranked casinos name one authority in their terms and turn up under another in a register, or print one number in the footer and a different one on a policy page. Both sides are shown here; neither is chosen.
Most casinos print one licence line and leave it there. A handful of the ranked operators leave a reader with two licence numbers, two authorities, or a number on one side and silence on the other. This page collects those cases, gives each statement its source and its read date, and stops short of deciding which record is the true one.
That restraint is deliberate. The files hold what each page and each register said on a given day, not the story of how the difference came about. Guessing at that story would add a third version to two that already disagree. The same restraint shapes the board of instant payout crypto casinos, where each printed statement stays filed under its own page instead of being merged into a single verdict.
On this page
- How two licence numbers end up behind one brand
- Metaspins: Anjouan in the terms, Curaçao on the register
- Bitcasino.io: one number in the footer, another on the AML page
- Wild Fortune: Tobique in the terms, Anjouan in the register
- Bitsler: an application in the terms, a certificate on the register
- Thunderpick: silence in the terms, an entry on the register
- Reading two licence numbers without picking one
- What a licence split tells you about payouts
- Questions people actually type
How two licence numbers end up behind one brand
There are ordinary ways for this to happen. A group can hold licences with more than one authority. A site can move from one licensing body to another and update its footer before its terms, or its terms before a side document. A register can record a change months before the casino's own copy catches up, or the reverse.
None of those explanations is on file for any operator below, and none is offered as the answer. They are listed only so that a mismatch is read for what it is: a sign that two documents were not edited together. It is not, on its own, a finding of wrongdoing.
Two neighbouring cases are kept elsewhere because they differ in kind. Wild.io has one certificate, OGL/2024/210/0198, but its terms and that certificate name two different companies, Stack Gaming Ltd and Nonce Gaming B.V. Rocketpot has one string, 1668/JAZ, which its footer presents as a licence while clause 1.2 treats it as the registration number of a company, and the Curaçao portal marked it «not valid» when searched on 12 and again on 13 September 2026.
What a mismatch does change is how much a single line can be trusted. A reader who sees one number in a footer and stops there knows less than they think. The fifth criterion — does a register list the operator's own domain — is explained operator by operator on the licence page.
| Casino | Points | Licence | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
 VaveReal-money account run by the editors | 3/5 | Curaçao · certificate lists vavegame.com | Visit the casino |
1 Bitcasino.io | 4/5 | Curaçao · register shows active | Visit the casinoFact box |
2 Rocketpot | 4/5 | Curaçao · portal says not valid | Visit the casinoFact box |
6 Shuffle.com | 3/5 | Curaçao · register shows active | Visit the casinoFact box |
7 Bitsler | 2/5 | Curaçao · register shows active | Visit the casinoFact box |
8 Thunderpick | 2/5 | Curaçao · register shows active | Visit the casinoFact box |
9 Jack.comknown as Jackbit until 29 May 2026 | 1/5 | Curaçao · register shows active | Visit the casinoFact box |
Every Visit the casino button opens the same place: the casino this site is paid to feature, and not the operator printed in the row beside it. Fact box goes to that operator’s own entry, where the clauses behind its points are quoted. The points are counted from published terms and register entries; that count is not for sale.
Metaspins: Anjouan in the terms, Curaçao on the register
Clause 1.1 of the Metaspins terms names Anjouan as the licensing authority and gives the number ALSI-202606048-FI2. The Curaçao register tells a different story. Searched on 12 September 2026, it showed OGL/2024/1063/0437, held by Metaspins N.V., marked active, with metaspins.com as the domain.
So the contract points to one body and one number, and a register points to another body and another number for the same address. The files do not reconcile the two. The split card at the top of this page places them next to each other.
For the ranking, this is why Metaspins does not receive the fifth point: the licence the terms name and the licence the register lists are not the same licence. Its payout clauses are unaffected by that decision and are read on their own merits, from the play-through rule in 4.2 to the monthly instalments allowed by 12.5.
Bitcasino.io: one number in the footer, another on the AML page
The footer of Bitcasino.io, and its licence page too, carry the number OGL/2023/111/0069. The register agrees with that line: on 12 September 2026 the certificate, held by Moon Technologies B.V. and issued 1 July 2024, was active and carried bitcasino.io.
The site's AML policy page prints something else, 1668/JAZ. That page has its own date line, «Updated: 24.11.2022». Both pages were live when they were read on 2 September 2026, so a visitor who happens to open the policy page first meets a different number from one who scrolls to the footer.
Here the register sides with one of the two pages, and that is recorded as a fact about the register. Which page the operator considers current is not something the files can tell you, and a side document that trails behind is a pattern described among the six places a statement can be printed.
Terms accepted at sign-up
Tobique Gaming Commission, licence 0000064 (also in the footer) cl. 1.1
Authority’s register
Anjouan, ALSI-202509073-FI2, Metlait SRL, for wildfortune.io
The contract and the register name different licensing bodies.
Wild Fortune: Tobique in the terms, Anjouan in the register
Clause 1.1 of the Wild Fortune terms, and the footer with it, name the Tobique Gaming Commission and licence 0000064. The Anjouan register, looked up on 12 September 2026, lists ALSI-202509073-FI2 for wildfortune.io, with Metlait SRL as holder, issued 30 September 2025 and running to 29 September 2026.
The contract and the register therefore name different licensing bodies. Wild Fortune keeps the fifth ranking point, because the criterion asks only whether a register lists a licence for the casino's own domain, and the Anjouan entry does. The Tobique line in the terms remains on file beside it.
The register entry carries an end date close to the reading date. Anyone relying on it after 29 September 2026 should search the register again rather than trust the result recorded here.
Bitsler: an application in the terms, a certificate on the register
Bitsler's footer names Oyine N.V., company number 144430, and speaks of a «valid Certificate of Operation». Clause 1.1 of the terms describes OGL/2024/930/0387 differently, as an application that is still in progress.
The register had moved past that stage. On 12 September 2026 it carried bitsler.com on OGL/2024/930/0387, and it records the issue date as 22 July 2024. The terms, read on 2 September 2026, still used the earlier wording.
This is the mildest case on the page. The number is the same everywhere; only its status is described two ways. It still matters, because a reader who stops at clause 1.1 would come away thinking no licence had been granted.
Thunderpick: silence in the terms, an entry on the register
Thunderpick's case is an absence rather than a clash. Its terms, read on 2 September 2026, name no licensing authority and print no number anywhere. The register, searched on 26 August 2026, lists OGL/2024/677/0722 as active, with Napier Ltd as holder.
A reader who starts from the contract finds nothing to look up. A reader who starts from the register finds an entry but no link back to it in the terms. Both observations are true at once, which is why the board marks the case as silence and not as contradiction.
The practical gap is small but real. If you want the licence behind a contract you are about to accept, the contract itself will not give it to you, and the register search has to begin from the domain instead of from a number.
Reading two licence numbers without picking one
You do not need to resolve a split to act sensibly around it. A few habits keep you on firm ground.
- Write down every version. Footer, terms clause, policy page and register result, each with the date you saw it.
- Search the register by domain. Type the address you actually use; a brand name can match several entries or none.
- Compare the company names. Metaspins N.V., Metlait SRL, Moon Technologies B.V., Oyine N.V. and Napier Ltd are the holders on file; check whether the terms name the same company as the register.
- Ask in writing. Put both numbers to support and ask which licence covers your account. Keep the answer with your dated copy of the terms.
- Search again later. Entries are issued, renewed and end; Wild Fortune's runs to 29 September 2026.
Mismatches of a different kind, where a casino's own pages disagree on a minimum, a fee or a document threshold, are gathered on the page about one casino and its several documents.
What a licence split tells you about payouts
Very little, and that is worth saying plainly. None of the entries above, and none of the footers, says anything about how withdrawals are handled. The rules that decide what happens to your money sit in the terms: identity checks, play-through, caps, instalments and fees.
So a clean licence line is not a reason to skip the payout clauses, and a messy one is not proof that payouts will fail. Both are separate questions, and this site scores them separately. How the five criteria and the weight of each document are set is explained in the method.
Questions people actually type
Which of the two licence numbers should I believe?
This site does not choose, because the documents do not settle it and a guess would only add another version. What you can do is record both with dates, search the register by the domain you play on, compare the company names, and ask the operator in writing which licence covers your account. Keep that reply together with a dated copy of the terms you accepted.Why does Wild Fortune keep the licence point when its terms name another authority?
The fifth criterion asks one literal question: does an authority's register list a licence for the casino's own domain? The Anjouan register listed ALSI-202509073-FI2 for wildfortune.io on 12 September 2026, so the answer was yes. The Tobique Gaming Commission line in clause 1.1 and the footer is shown beside it and is not removed or explained away.Does a licence mismatch mean a casino will not pay?
No such conclusion follows from the files. A register entry and a footer line say who is licensed, not how withdrawals are handled. Payout rules sit in the terms, clause by clause, and they are read separately. A mismatch is a reason to keep better records and to ask the operator in writing, not a prediction about any individual withdrawal.